Archive for July, 2010

Quality vs Quantity: Discussing the Value of Business Social Networking

Tuesday, July 20th, 2010

How Often You Post May Not Be As Important as What You Post on Business Social Networks

Ideas for posting quality information on business social networks. Courtesy of Intersection Consulting.

Ideas for posting quality information on business social networking sites. Courtesy of Intersection Consulting.

I spent nearly 2 hours on LinkedIn today, which is much more than other business social networks I use. LinkedIn has changed with the times and I suppose the demand from its members. For example, when you visit a group, the first thing you see is not a listing of the latest discussions, but a rolling horizontal listing of the most popular discussions, job posts, events, etc. It’s like a movie review of your group. I’m not fond of flashing and rolling images on webpages, and I’m not so sure if I like this “feature” on LinkedIn either.

However, in the middle of posting to several groups, I did come across one discussion that was started 7 months ago (I think I contributed to the same discussion 2 months ago) about how many social networking sites people “actively engage in on a regular basis.” For business, I use three or four on a weekly basis, and you? Anyway, I was even more astounded with the amount of comments posted – 358 as of this afternoon. One comment especially caught my eye, which is the purpose of this blog post.

“Remember, it’s not just how much you post on a regular basis (daily, weekly, etc), but the quality of information you provide on any social network” for business or personal use. Someone can post a tweet every hour; however, if the tweets aren’t providing any real value or are all sales messages then you’re not giving your audience any value. Invariably if you post to your business social networks less, but offer valuable information especially of interest to your audience and they can find it again if needed, then your business is truly offering quality information.

What are your competitors doing with social networking for business? Do it better and provide the types of posts, tweets, discussion starters and answers you would want to read whether you’re tweeting in 140 characters or less or you’re providing a product review. Your audience is listening and they want quality, not just large quantities of useless fan page posts. Show your audience you’re human too. I heard from another social media for business webinar that “social networks are about building relationships with people.”

Last thoughts: if your business wants to build and strengthen a relationship with people, then you need to be an attentive listener as well as pay attention to the needs of your audience. Remember those 358+ comments posted from just 1 question? A very good example of a quality question with mutually quality comments as well as quantity.

We’d like to hear your 2 cents on this topic about “Quality vs Quantity: Discussing the Value of  Social Networks for Business.” Please post your comments below, we do moderate all comments and edit as necessary (see blog post on NoFollow links).

5 Reasons Why NoFollow Tags Are Useless for Link Building

Monday, July 19th, 2010
The NoFollow attribute is useless when link building, and sometimes webmasters dont even know theyre using it.

The NoFollow attribute is useless when link building. Photo courtesy of SearchEngineJournal.com.

According to an article on SearchEngineJournal.com, the NoFollow link attribute (rel=”nofollow”) was created to block search engines from following links in blog comments, which was supposed to stop comment spamming. The problem is, spammers still continue to spam, and the NoFollow attribute hurts those people who aren’t spamming when trying to engage in link building. NoFollow is now being used online in more than just blog comments, in fact, Google recomments that paid links use NoFollow. But who would pay for a link with a NoFollow attribute? Here are 5 reasons why NoFollow tags should be done away with:

NoFollow tags don’t work. NoFollow doesn’t discourage blog comment spammers and if a human blogger pays attention to the comments he or she is getting, there’s really no point in the NoFollow attribute because he or she will see the spam within a day and delete it.

Many bloggers don’t even know they’re using NoFollow because it’s often the default setting on popular blog sites like WordPress.

What is the point of visiting link directories in hopes of link building when the directory only offers a NoFollow link? No one would ever purchase a listing because there would be no value attached to having a link in that directory.

Linking to someone with a NoFollow tag attached is a sign of distrust. If you automatically don’t trust them, why would they trust you when you expect a reciprical link?

Search engines can’t seem to make up their mind about when NoFollow should be used, which causes confusion, especially for webmasters who aren’t familiar with the pitfalls of NoFollow. This results in webmasters adding the NoFollow attribute to all outgoing links from their Web site which doesn’t help anyone with link building. When people post a relevant and well-thought out comment on a blog post, it adds more content to the blog and can provoke more relevant conversation. Since the commenter is helping you add relevant content, it’s professional courtesy to allow them to post a link to their blog without NoFollow so it actually gets indexed.

According to the SearchEngineJournal.com article, “NoFollow is a poor search engine’s solution to conceal its own failure to rank Web sites appropriately.” It may have seemed like a good idea at first, but it’s failure and misuse have rendered it useless, which is why NoFollow tags must go! For more information on NoFollow, read the full article on SearchEngineJournal.com.

Who is Watching Your Google PPC Advertising Campaigns?

Friday, July 16th, 2010

New Adwords Feature May Give More Information Away to Your Competitors Than You Think

With a new feature that is only available to selected advertisers on Google, Analyze Competition, will compare your Pay-Per-Click (PPC) advertising campaign keywords with other advertisers. So what exactly will your competition know about your Google Adwords account?

Google explains the new feature, Analyze Competition, “examines your account’s activity over the past two weeks and lists categories that represent the products or services you’re advertising. Categories are based on actual Google.com search terms and are matched up against your keywords, ad text, and landing page text. For each category associated with your account, you’ll see a bar graph, which shows your individual performance compared to the average performance of other advertisers in the same category.”

Furthermore it will also look at your other PPC campaign metrics including impressions, clicks, and average position.

Now, while this may seem advantageous to your PPC campaign to determine exactly where you stand with your competition, your competitors are looking at this as well. So the question remains how much information do you really want to give away for free?

We’d like to hear your thoughts and opinions about this new feature